<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Sustainable Energy Plan for Brazil?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.temasactuales.com/temasblog/environmental-protection/a-sustainable-energy-plan-for-brazil/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.temasactuales.com/temasblog/environmental-protection/a-sustainable-energy-plan-for-brazil/</link>
	<description>Musings about the Evolution of Consumer, Environmental &#38; Health Policy in Latin America &#38; the Caribbean</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 18:29:31 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Keith R</title>
		<link>http://www.temasactuales.com/temasblog/environmental-protection/a-sustainable-energy-plan-for-brazil/comment-page-1/#comment-451</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 14:26:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.temasactuales.com/temasblog/?p=62#comment-451</guid>
		<description>Hi Simon.  Welcome to the &lt;i&gt;Temas Blog&lt;/i&gt; and thanks for commenting and for mentioning me on your blog (which I linking to, since biofuels is such a hot subject in LAC nations).  I hope you visit and comment often; &lt;i&gt;all &lt;b&gt;constructive&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt; feedback is welcome here, but I would especially appreciate your insights on any biofuel-related item I post on (such as the Ecopetrol story above, for example).

While I too welcomed the NPE 2030&#039;s emphasis on dropping consumption of wood and vegetable-based charcoal as fuel sources, I was puzzled by its relatively weak vision (compared to the government&#039;s rhetoric in the past 4 yrs) for biodiesel and biomass co-generation.  

I was even more confounded by its near dismissal of Brazil&#039;s enormous solar &amp; wind potential and its downplaying of the possibilities for energy efficiency savings.  One thing I forgot to mention in my article is that the NPE envisions getting most of the energy efficiency gains in the residential sector, which is strange when the real big gains are more likely in motors in the industrial sector and building energy efficiency...

Brazil is one country that has the necessary tools in place (a fairly solid national energy efficiency law, a labeling system, a testing and certification authority (INMETRO) with substantial experience in this particular area, a good R&amp;D and testing infrastructure, etc.) to realize significant gains in a short time frame.  The Lula Administration needs to make better use of that than they have so far, in my opinion.

Best Regards,
Keith</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Simon.  Welcome to the <i>Temas Blog</i> and thanks for commenting and for mentioning me on your blog (which I linking to, since biofuels is such a hot subject in LAC nations).  I hope you visit and comment often; <i>all <b>constructive</b></i> feedback is welcome here, but I would especially appreciate your insights on any biofuel-related item I post on (such as the Ecopetrol story above, for example).</p>
<p>While I too welcomed the NPE 2030&#8217;s emphasis on dropping consumption of wood and vegetable-based charcoal as fuel sources, I was puzzled by its relatively weak vision (compared to the government&#8217;s rhetoric in the past 4 yrs) for biodiesel and biomass co-generation.  </p>
<p>I was even more confounded by its near dismissal of Brazil&#8217;s enormous solar &#038; wind potential and its downplaying of the possibilities for energy efficiency savings.  One thing I forgot to mention in my article is that the NPE envisions getting most of the energy efficiency gains in the residential sector, which is strange when the real big gains are more likely in motors in the industrial sector and building energy efficiency&#8230;</p>
<p>Brazil is one country that has the necessary tools in place (a fairly solid national energy efficiency law, a labeling system, a testing and certification authority (INMETRO) with substantial experience in this particular area, a good R&#038;D and testing infrastructure, etc.) to realize significant gains in a short time frame.  The Lula Administration needs to make better use of that than they have so far, in my opinion.</p>
<p>Best Regards,<br />
Keith</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: biofuelsimon</title>
		<link>http://www.temasactuales.com/temasblog/environmental-protection/a-sustainable-energy-plan-for-brazil/comment-page-1/#comment-445</link>
		<dc:creator>biofuelsimon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 09:46:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.temasactuales.com/temasblog/?p=62#comment-445</guid>
		<description>It is also good to see that the share of wood and non-sustainable sources of energy is planned to fall in the energy mixture... of course, whether it does or not remains to be seen...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is also good to see that the share of wood and non-sustainable sources of energy is planned to fall in the energy mixture&#8230; of course, whether it does or not remains to be seen&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
