Subscribe to My Feed




Add to Technorati Favorites

Adicionar aos Favoritos BlogBlogs



KudoSurf Me!


Rate Me on BlogHop.com!
the best pretty good okay pretty bad the worst help?


Tell a Friend




  • Polls

    How Is My Site? / ¿Cómo es mi sitio web?

    View Results

    Loading ... Loading ...
  • Recent Comments:


  • Get your own Widget



    « | Home | »

    Assessing the Lamberts Windfarm Proposal

    By Keith R | June 7, 2007

    Topics: Energy & the Environment, Renewable Sources | No Comments »

    Email This Post Email This Post     Adicionar artigo ao Total News      
    1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
    Loading ... Loading ...


    Back in my post “A Sustainable Energy Plan for Barbados?“, I mentioned that a linchpin of the Barbados government plan to expand the use of renewable sources in the island’s power supply was Barbados Light & Power’s (BLP) plans for a windfarm at Lamberts, St. Lucy.

    That proposal is hardly a “done deal” yet, though. Legally BLP still has to undergo the environmental impact assessment (EIA) and public consultation phase for the project, which they are doing now.

    But they are hardly doing in it in a completely transparent manner. For example, the third version of BLP’s environmental assessment report is available on BLP’s website — although you’d never find it unless you knew beforehand where to look, because BLP does not include a reference to it on its homepage, its pages on “How We Work” and “Looking to the Future,” nor on its sitemap. But then, you’re reading The Temas Blog, and we believe in corporate transparency about environment, health and safety (EHS) matters, so we’ll tell you where to look: http://www.blpc.com.bb/study/eaLamberts.cfm

    I understand from sources on Barbados that people are also having a difficult time getting questions answered and providing input on the EIA. For example, neither BLP nor the Town and Country Planning Department will say what is the deadline for public comments on the latest EIA draft, whether or not this is to be the last version of the impact report before project approval, and whether or not there will be another public meeting in St. Lucy to discuss the project, its EIA and any lingering concerns residents might have.

    Regardless of what you think of the merits of wind farms in general and the Lamberts proposal in particular, this is not the way to go about building local consensus and support for a renewable energy project.

    – Keith R

    P.S. Is there anyone out there with the time and expertise to scan the report and offer feedback on how thorough and technically sound it is, what points it covers well and what it might be missing? I am currently too swamped to do personally. You can offer your observations either through comments to this post, emails to me or if there is a brave soul out there, as a guest post here on The Temas Blog.

    Spread the Word:
    • del.icio.us
    • Meneame
    • Technorati
    • SphereIt
    • Rec6
    • BarraPunto
    • blogmarks
    • NewsVine
    • BlinkList
    • connotea
    • Fark
    • LinkaGoGo
    • Netvouz
    • Simpy
    • Wists
    • DZone
    • Fleck
    • Slashdot
    • blogtercimlap
    • DotNetKicks
    • Linkter
    • MyShare
    • Scoopeo
    • ThisNext
    • Webride
    • IndianPad
    • Haohao
    • Hemidemi
    • Internetmedia
    • eKudos
    • Facebook
    • Webnews.de
    • Wikio FR
    • Blogosphere News
    • Global Grind
    • HealthRanker
    • laaik.it
    • LinkedIn
    • Faves
    • MySpace
    • Propeller
    • Live
    • Sphinn
    • Kirtsy
    • LinkArena
    • Mixx
    • muti
    • N4G
    • NuJIJ
    • Segnalo
    • Socialogs
    • Upnews
    • Bitacoras.com
    • Netvibes
    • Wikio

    Post to Twitter Post to Plurk Plurk This Post Post to Yahoo Buzz Buzz This Post Post to Ping.fm Ping This Post Post to Reddit Reddit Post to StumbleUpon Stumble This Post

    Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

    Subscribe to My Comments Feed

    Leave a Reply